告知: BBC不對外來網站内容負責 YouTube 内容可能包含廣告
library of videos, images, and music is limited.
，更多细节参见safew官方版本下载
人 民 网 版 权 所 有 ，未 经 书 面 授 权 禁 止 使 用
I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.